ケーラー モリエ

这是一个用资本主义方式生产，用封建制度进行管理，号称自己走社会主义道路的奴隶制国家

Did anyone actually read and understand the article above? Or are they simply closing their eyes and shutting their ears to a humble request made by a benevolent and just man? China is doomed. Its people are conditioned to listen to propaganda and have forgotten how to be a human being. The lies have been spread for so long that the people have forgotten what truth is or means. Such arrogance and ignorance will, in the end, bring about more suffering to its people.

在与中央政府进行的第9次，也即最新一次谈判中，达赖喇嘛私人代表向中央政府提交了《为全体藏人获得真正自治的备忘录》。《国际西藏邮报》发表时是采用《全体西藏民族实现名符其实自治的建议》的标题，中国中央政府将此报告称为《为全体藏人获得真正自治的备忘录》。

Five professors of Peking University's Law School have written to the National People's Congress Standing Committee to either annul the Urban Housing Demolition and Relocation Management Regulation or advise the State Council to revise it.

Human Rights Watch has come out with a hard-hitting report on China’s black jails, illegal detention facilities where petitioners seeking to appeal to the central government are detained. The report, “Alleyway in Hell”, has a wide range of information on the jails and the circumstances in which people are put there, having conducted interviews with dozens of former victims. (Anyone having trouble accessing the HRW website can get a copy of the report here.)

the unknown truth of 1975 Yunnan Shadian massacre in English PDF

for a new china, we must overthorw CPC, buz CPC will not allowed another party to be leader in china, CPC cares only its own interest, CPC doesnt care about people's interest, everthing will under the name of national interest, so if we want real freedom and democracy, we must fight for it, not just suggest it and be paitent wait for it changes.

《行动目标希特勒》是一部根据二战时期的真实事件改编而成的电影，故事讲述了纳粹德国国防军中一群高层军官，认为战争使德国陷入灾难的深渊，是对世界人们犯下罪行，而这一切都是因为最高元首希特勒及其支持者所为，那群反纳粹军官们认为国家利益高于一切，要想拯救德国，那么唯的一方法就是消灭希特勒和他的支持者，掀起一场政变，从而使战争结束，解救德国。

媒体采访东航某高官，相当高的。倒是一脸敦厚的样子，只是每每问道一些不怎么好做答问题便说，虽然怎么怎么也有道理，也应该，但是我们是国家企业，一切要以国家利益为重。 于是，当东航18个航班的飞行员们罢飞，载着上千名乘客从目的地上空转了一圈又飞回起飞机场的时候，东航方面很国家，很利益的向乘客解释道，事件是由于天气原因造成不能降落。 遗憾的是，后续的沟通工作做的不是很及时，中央气象台专家在接受采访时没有对这件事情采取特别处理。另外其他很多飞同区域的航空公司不太愿意担当违规在恶劣天气降落的严重罪名。 我记得有脱口秀主持人说过，我们不在乎克林顿上不上莱温斯基，我们只想问他为什么对公众撒谎。 昨晚的一档犯罪节目，最后说，他杀的都是些守法的公民，都是些诚实的人。

北京奧運會開幕式并不是真的那么光鮮，可能掩蓋著很多丑陋的東西。在開幕式剛剛過去几天，奧運會開幕式作假的消息就像不斷獲得獎牌一樣，頻頻傳出﹐讓中共善于造假的形像更加突出。

不要一切以“为了国家利益”为借口，而肆无忌惮的侵犯人民的合法利益，从而完美的将自己化身为无奈高尚正义的象征。牺牲个人利益为了国家利益的本质是，为了增强国家的实力，从而更好的有效地保护人民的利益，请不要本末倒置。当今中国，既无战乱，也无天灾，更无人祸，所以请不要继续以“一切为了国家利益”为借口，而一而再再而三的，因言获罪，执法机关暴力执法，强制拆迁等。

I question the motivation of tiananmen square protests, for me, just like i heard that Edison Chen get international attention because of sex photo scandal, no matter where he goes, people will put eyes on him, just like someone become famous because of something, then he keeping hot still because of same thing.

六四过去20多年了，那些“领袖”们拿着外国护照，过着舒适的日子，在看看其他的“暴徒”们的生活吧，不要说哈佛大学博士学位，什么高尚的牧师，或者还可以参政议政，他们连最基本的生活贫困线都没有办法够上。

当毒蛇、迷彩服、钢管、燃烧瓶、汽油等危险物品频频出现在拆迁现场，拆迁正在演变成一种极其危险的高强度对抗战，最近，随着成都一位女业主唐福珍在拆迁现场自焚身亡，拆迁带来的生命之债已如此惨烈——

i e-mail my mother about Tiananmen Square massacre some pictures and my words, she really have no idea about the truth of the massacre on 1989, but she told me lucky enough her brorher just left the square at that time, otherwise, he wont be alive now. but she shocked when she saw the real pictures. but when mother reply me, i got this

Now, China is one of few socialistic countries in the world. Is it good or not for China to become a democratic country? Before answering this question, we need to know how to judge a national policy good or not. In my opinion, if a national policy passes the following two criteria, then it is a good policy: 1. First, Long Term Interest. The main purpose of the national policy is for the best interest of the country’s majority people who will be living in this country 200 years later. 2. Second, Practicability and Acceptability. This national policy is practical and acceptable by the country’s people who are currently living in this country. Someone may think the fist criterion is wrong, because a national policy should focus on the best interest of the majority people who are currently living in the country. As a country’s leader, who should not only consider the current people’s interest, but also consider the people’s interest in long run. When there is a conflict between current interest and future interest, I think the policy maker should give the priority to the future interest, Because that is the reason why human being’s new generation can have a better life than the old generation in the past. I hope it still is in the future. In the same time, I do not mean that the policy maker can overlook the current people’s interest. The current people’s interest will be protected by the second criterion, practicability and acceptability. One big challenge for the country’s leader is to let current people understand or at least accept the new policy. To achieve this goal, the country’s leader has no choice but considering the current people’s interest when he/she makes a new policy for the country. Based on above criteria, let us find the answer for China needs Democracy or not. The democracy supporter may say that democratic national system can bring a country wealth, and give its people a better material life comparing with socialistic national system. Thus, for better economic development, China needs democracy. Personally, I do not agree with this opinion. To better understand this issue, we need to see two countries as example. First, Mexico has been a democratic country for about 100 years. No one can deny that Mexico is still an undeveloped county and many of its people are still living in poverty. Second, India is another example. Since 1947, India has been an independent democratic country. As Mexico, the democratic political system does not make India a wealthy country, and many Indian people are still living in hunger everyday. Comparing with Mexico and India, China has been developed rapidly in the last 30 years. Chinese people are having much better material life than 30 years. It is impossible for Mexico and India to develop economically as fast as China did in the last 30 years. Thus, we can safely say that Democracy may make a country wealthy, but it is not 100 per cent. Since Democracy may not help China to develop faster economically, will democracy make China a better country? Yes,I think so, because Democracy can mitigate official corruption, the biggest social problem Chinese people are facing now. As we know, the most critical concern about Chinese society is government corruption. Now, official corruptions are causing social violations almost everywhere is China. Even though, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) fought for many years to control this problem, official corruption in china is becoming more serious year-by-year. We can say that without political reform, CCP can not mitigate the corruption problem in the near future. Why the official corruption can not be controlled by Chinese government? In my opinion, the one party political structure in China is the prime reason for this problem. It is common sense that intendance is necessary in any group or organization. Without intendance, the person or a group of person in power will tend to abuse his/her or their power sooner or later. In current Chinese government, almost every high-rank official positions are held by the members of CCP. Since the officials are acting under their party’s rule and direction, it is almost impossible for CCP officials, as one group of people, to correct their own wrong action. In realty, CCP can do whatever it wants to do, and no power can check or stop it. CCP does not need to give an explanation for what it is doing, because Chinese people have no power and no representative to ask for that. There must be some independent political groups to act as watchdogs to the official’s behavior as in the democratic countries. If so, the official corruption problem in China can be stopped or at least mitigated. Let us see some examples. In 1998, Bill Clinton, the former President of the United States, was impeached for wrong doings even when he is still in power. In 2006, Chen Shui-bian, the former president of Taiwan, was impeached and investigated also when he was still a president of Taiwan. There are many examples to show us that in democratic countries, it is normal for high officials, even the highest official, President, can be impeached for his wrong doing. This kind of thing is impossible to happen in communist county, China. Because Chinese people have no actual power to elect and check official’s action, official’ wrong doing can not be punished, that is why official corruption can not mitigated in China. Corruption problem is making Chinese society become more unstable. To make China a harmonious society, the corruption problem must be solved first. Therefore, we need new political group in China acting independently to CCP. Under the current Chinese Constitutional Law, Article 35, Citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration. However, as we know, people in China are prohibited to free press and assembly. There are many political activists held in Chinese prison. CCP government does not give Chinese people the freedom of speech, press, and assembly under the Constitution. Corruption is in conflict with the interest of both Current and future Chinese people. It is no doubt that every national Chinese want to stop official corruption in China as soon as possible. In my opinion, Democracy is the only resolution to stop official corruption in China. Since Democracy can stop official corruption, the most national Chinese people will support it. To stop corruption, to make China a better country, and to honor the Constitution of China, we need reforming Chinese political system. For the best interest of the future Chinese people, we need democracy in China.

2008年11月27日上午，我怀揣《零八宪章》（征求意见稿）前往许良英先生家。正在家中复习功课准备考研的小孙女告诉我，爷爷早上去了颐和 园，11点归。于是我自己动手沏了杯绿茶，一人坐在先生的书房中，拿出征求意见稿的大字文本，再次阅读起来。几天前的一次聚会上，朋友们都希望德高望重的 许先生能在宪章上签名，也都知道，许先生必定会在提出尖锐的修订意见后，才有可能会签。另外大家也清楚，由我出面找许先生，先生的批评或许会稍稍留一点情 面。读完文稿，我默默地告诫自己，一定要耳顺，要听得进先生的任何批评，不要太“据理力争”。

从 年初的胡佳到近日的刘晓波，忽然对“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”这个罪名产生了兴趣。大家都知道，不管什么东西一带“国家”就有一种很拽的感觉，比如“国家罗 汉”，那么一个人要出干什么惊天动地的事情才配得起这么拽的罪名呢？在网上搜了一下看了半宿竟然有些失望，“煽动颠覆国家政权”竟然可以如此简单，你甚至 可以犯了而不自知，只要“国家”想。耐心读完以下文字和链接，相信我们就可以“同一个世界，同一种感觉”了，因为你可能就是下一个。

最近封网已经严重影响了互联网的正常健康发展，很多媒体也拼命的夸大网络色情的宣传。导致很多电信企业害怕承担责任，直接一封了事。痛苦不堪的是广大的网民和站长。而没有人来关注这些人的利益损失。很多网站在千辛万苦的过程中才做起来，更多的人把网络的便捷当做一个创业的平台，最便捷的生活工具。而今天再打开网站，不是打不开，就是解析停止。这次互联网的浩劫，更看成是某些部门的不作为，一刀切思想。